<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Illinois FOIA &amp; OMA Reference: 7(1)(d)(i)</title>
  <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/exemptions/7-1-d-i/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/exemptions/7-1-d-i/"/>
  <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/exemptions/7-1-d-i/</id>
  <updated>2025-02-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>City of Granite City improperly denied crash report under 7(1)(d)(i)</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-83921/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-83921/</id>
    <updated>2025-02-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A requester asked the City of Granite City for crash reports and videos related to a specific accident. The City denied the request under section 7(1)(d)(i) of FOIA, claiming the records were exempt as part of a pending law enforcement proceeding. The Illinois Attorney General's Public Access Bureau reviewed the case and found that the City's blanket denial was improper, but that a small portion of witness statements could be withheld because their release would interfere with the accident recon</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lake County Forest Preserve District improperly denied I-Pass records under multiple FOIA exemptions</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-82640/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-82640/</id>
    <updated>2024-12-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A requester asked for I-Pass records related to a specific person, but the Lake County Forest Preserve District refused, claiming the records were exempt under several FOIA exemptions. The Attorney General's office reviewed the case and concluded that the District did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that the records were exempt under sections 7(1)(c), 7.5(w), 7(1)(d)(i), or 7(1)(d)(vi) of FOIA. The determination found that the District improperly denied the request.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>City of Chicago OEMC properly withheld shooting video under law enforcement proceedings exemption</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-84370/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-84370/</id>
    <updated>2024-12-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A requester asked the Chicago Office of Emergency Management and Communications (OEMC) for video footage of a shooting, but OEMC denied the request, citing that releasing the video could interfere with an active police investigation. The Illinois Attorney General's Public Access Bureau reviewed the case and determined that no further action was warranted because the footage was exempt from disclosure under FOIA's law enforcement proceedings exemption. This means the request was denied for now, b</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lee County Sheriff's Office improperly withheld incident report under 7(1)(d)(i) for swan decoy case</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-82717/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-82717/</id>
    <updated>2024-10-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A citizen requested a police incident report about missing swan decoys, but the Sheriff's Office refused to release it, claiming it would interfere with an ongoing court case. The Attorney General's Public Access Counselor reviewed the request and found that the Sheriff's Office did not provide enough evidence to justify keeping the report secret. Consequently, the Sheriff's Office was told they must release the records.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>City of Peoria improperly withheld police interview records under 7(1)(d)(i) and 7(1)(d)(iii)</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-79596/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-79596/</id>
    <updated>2024-03-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A reporter requested records of a specific police interview, but the City of Peoria refused to release them, claiming they were exempt from disclosure. The Attorney General's Public Access Counselor reviewed the case and concluded that the City's denial was improper. This means the City should have provided the records to the requester.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Park Ridge Police Department improperly invoked federal exemptions for death investigation records</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-57377/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-57377/</id>
    <updated>2023-06-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A reporter requested police records about a death investigation from the Park Ridge Police Department, which refused to provide them, citing federal FOIA exemptions. The Illinois Attorney General's Public Access Bureau reviewed the case and determined that the department's response violated the Illinois Freedom of Information Act because the department, as a state public body, could not rely on federal FOIA exemptions. The determination does not specify any remedy or order to release the records</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>City of Kankakee improperly withheld surveillance video under FOIA exemptions 7(1)(d)(i) and (iii)</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-80655/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-80655/</id>
    <updated>2022-07-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A citizen requested surveillance video of a shooting from the City of Kankakee, but the City refused to release it, claiming it would interfere with an ongoing legal case. The Attorney General's office reviewed the records and found the City did not prove that releasing the video would actually harm the legal process. Consequently, the PAC asked the City to provide the records to the requester.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>City of Waukegan improperly withheld incident report under active investigation exemptions</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-61099/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-61099/</id>
    <updated>2020-03-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A law firm requested a police incident report from the City of Waukegan, but the City refused to provide it, claiming it was part of an active investigation. The Attorney General's office reviewed the request and found that the City was wrong to withhold the entire document. The City was asked to release the non-exempt portions of the report.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chicago Police Department did not violate FOIA by withholding body camera footage under 7(1)(d)</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-60599/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-60599/</id>
    <updated>2020-01-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A journalist requested police body camera footage from a search warrant execution at a private home. The Chicago Police Department denied the request, citing law enforcement exemptions. The Attorney General's office agreed that the police department did not violate the law, noting that the department is not required to release the footage even if the subjects of the video provide consent.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Village of Forest Park no violation for withholding police video under law enforcement exemptions</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-32130/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-32130/</id>
    <updated>2019-03-29T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The question was whether the Village of Forest Park properly withheld surveillance videos of a hit-and-run under FOIA Section 7(1)(d) exemptions, including an unargued but implicated Section 7(1)(d)(iii) fair-trial exemption. The Public Access Bureau held that the Village did not improperly deny the request at the time it was submitted, because disclosure during the pendency of the criminal prosecution would have created a substantial likelihood of depriving the defendant of a fair trial. The re</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Illinois Department of Revenue did not violate FOIA by withholding audit manual sections</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-13591/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-13591/</id>
    <updated>2018-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A law firm requested internal audit manuals from the Illinois Department of Revenue to understand how the state determines corporate income and sales taxes. The Attorney General's office reviewed the request and concluded that the Department was legally allowed to keep these documents private to protect tax enforcement standards. This means the request for the records was denied and the case is now closed.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Duty to Provide &quot;Clear and Convincing&quot; Evidence to Support Assertion of Exemptions; Possibility of Obtaining Public Records through Discovery Does Not Preclude FOIA Requests</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/2013-pac-25483/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/2013-pac-25483/</id>
    <updated>2013-11-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The requester asked the police department for a copy of a specific police report, but the department denied the request, claiming disclosure would interfere with law enforcement proceedings and could deprive someone of a fair trial. The department also argued the requester should instead obtain the report through court discovery procedures. The PAC held that the department's justifications were vague and conclusory, failing to show by clear and convincing evidence that either exemption applied, </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
