<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Illinois FOIA &amp; OMA Reference: 7(1)(l)</title>
  <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/exemptions/7-1-l/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/exemptions/7-1-l/"/>
  <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/exemptions/7-1-l/</id>
  <updated>2025-03-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>North Clay School District properly withheld closed session minutes under 7(1)(l)</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-85548/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-85548/</id>
    <updated>2025-03-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A requester asked a school district for several years of closed session meeting minutes. The PAC ruled that the district was allowed to keep these records private because the district had not yet voted to make them public, as required by law. Consequently, the PAC closed the case without requiring the district to release the documents.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Downers Grove Public Library properly withheld closed session minutes and recordings under OMA and FOIA</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-81399/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-81399/</id>
    <updated>2024-05-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A library patron requested records from a closed-door meeting regarding an investigation into their own conduct. The library refused to release the meeting minutes and audio recording, citing laws that keep such records confidential. The Attorney General's office agreed with the library, noting that these records are protected and no further action will be taken.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Disclosure of Recordings of Public Meetings</title>
    <link href="https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/2017-pac-49564/"/>
    <id>https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/2017-pac-49564/</id>
    <updated>2017-11-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>The requester, a newspaper reporter, sought audio recordings of the housing authority board's open meetings from a given year, and the housing authority withheld them as preliminary, deliberative material. The Public Access Counselor held that a verbatim recording of a meeting that was open to the public is inherently subject to public scrutiny and is not the kind of predecisional record the deliberative-process exemption protects, regardless of the purpose for which the recording was made. The </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
