This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.
Illinois FOIA & OMA Reference

← All guides

What an Illinois Public Meeting Agenda Must Say Before Final Action

Sources checked October 17, 2026.

An agenda is advance notice of the business a public body expects to decide. For a proposed final action, a label such as “old business,” “personnel,” or a code section by itself may leave the public unable to tell what the body plans to do. The exact detail depends on the subject. Illinois law also requires a separate public recital at the meeting before final action; the agenda and that spoken announcement serve different purposes.

The agenda must identify the general subject of covered final action

Section 2.02(c) of the Open Meetings Act says that an agenda required under section 2.02 “shall set forth the general subject matter of any resolution or ordinance that will be the subject of final action at the meeting.” Regular meeting agendas generally must be posted at least 48 hours before the meeting under section 2.02(a). Read the current text of section 2.02 and section 2, including subsection (e).

The statutory phrase is “general subject matter.” It calls for the main subject of the anticipated action, not every argument, contract term, or detail. The statute’s specific wording refers to a resolution or ordinance that will be the subject of final action. In applying the agenda-notice requirement, the Attorney General’s Public Access Counselor (PAC) has considered whether agenda items gave useful advance notice of other kinds of decisions too. Those opinions are important guidance, but they are agency decisions, not controlling court precedent, and their conclusions depend on the records and circumstances in each matter.

In practice, an agenda item should tell a reader what kind of decision is expected and what matter it concerns. For example, “consider an ordinance amending the City Code concerning permit application fees” identifies a subject more clearly than “Ordinance 19-11” or a bare code citation. For a personnel decision, identify the general employee category and the type of transaction, such as employment, discipline, or dismissal. A specific person’s name is not automatically required on the agenda: in a 2026 binding opinion, the PAC expressly said the agenda did not have to name the police officer whose employment the board planned to terminate.

What the PAC examples show

These opinions do not create a universal wording formula. A question about a particular agenda turns on what action the body took, what the agenda actually said, and the applicable law. A PAC opinion is an administrative decision that may be reviewed in court; it is not a substitute for a court decision.

The spoken public recital is a separate requirement

Section 2(e) says that final action may not be taken in closed session and must be preceded by a public recital of the nature of the matter being considered and other information that will inform the public of the business being conducted. This recital happens aloud at the open meeting before the action. A posted agenda by itself does not satisfy that separate requirement.

In Board of Education of Springfield School District No. 186 v. Attorney General, the Illinois Supreme Court explained that the recital must identify the nature of the matter and give enough specific detail to identify the particular transaction or issue. The Court rejected the Attorney General’s earlier position that officials had to explain the action’s significance or recite all its terms. It held adequate a recital identifying the particular separation agreement between the superintendent and the board and stating the resolution’s substance. The Court’s decision addressed section 2(e); it should not be read as erasing section 2.02(c)’s separate advance-agenda requirement. 2017 IL 120343 (Illinois Supreme Court, official opinion) · Meeting notices and agendas topic hub

Later PAC opinions apply that identification requirement to their specific facts. In a 2019 matter, the PAC found inadequate a recital that announced a resolution authorizing a Notice to Remedy to be served on an unnamed teacher. Binding Opinion 19-004 (PDF) · Meeting notices and agendas topic hub

In a 2025 matter, the PAC found that the board needed to identify the proposed appointee before voting on an appointment to fill a trustee vacancy. These examples do not establish that every personnel matter or appointment always requires a name in the recital; the detail needed depends on what transaction the public body is deciding. Binding Opinion 25-009 (PDF) · Meeting notices and agendas topic hub

How to check an agenda

Before a meeting, save the posted agenda and note when you found it. For an item that may lead to a final decision, ask:

These questions can help identify what the agenda tells the public; they are not a substitute for applying the statute to the specific meeting. If the agenda is unclear, keep a copy and ask the clerk or public body what action the item covers. If the body acts, preserve the meeting recording, the open-session minutes, the agenda, and the exact motion or announcement before the action. Those details help distinguish an advance-notice question under section 2.02 from a public-recital question under section 2(e).

The Attorney General’s OMA request-for-review information explains the PAC process. Section 3.5(a) generally sets a 60-day period to request review, with a limited later-discovery rule; read the current statute and filing instructions promptly if you may seek review. A PAC opinion or determination does not predict how a court will resolve another meeting’s facts.

This is general information about Illinois law, not legal advice. Check the current statute, the exact agenda and meeting record, and any deadline that may apply to your situation.