FOIA section 7(1)(f)
FOIAPreliminary drafts, notes, and deliberative materials
5 ILCS 140/7(1)(f). Preliminary drafts, notes, and deliberative materials (pre-decisional "draft" exemption)
See every document citing this provision →
51 issues across 38 determination letters:25 violation found · 26 no violation.
Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.
Authorities the Bureau cites most on this issue
- Kalven v. City of Chicago, 2013 IL App (1st) 121846, ¶24, 7 N.E.3d 741, 748 (2013) cited 16 times
- Harwood v. McDonough, 344 Ill. App. 3d 242 (1st Dist. 2003) cited 12 times
- Harwood v. McDonough, 344 Ill. App. 3d 242, 247 (1st Dist. 2003) cited 8 times
- Fisher v. Office of the Illinois Attorney General, 2021 IL App (1st) 200225 cited 8 times
- Harwood, 344 Ill. App. 3d at 248 cited 7 times
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. Office of Management & Budget, 598 F.3d 865, 876 (D.C. Cir. 2010) cited 7 times
- Chicago Tribune Co. v. Cook County Assessor's Office cited 7 times
- Dumke v. City of Chicago, 2013 IL App (1st) 121668, 994 N.E.2d 573 (2013) cited 6 times
How to challenge a denial on this issue
AI-generated summary of the decisions listed on this page, with each point linked to the letters it comes from. Determination letters are not binding precedent and this is not legal advice. Open the letter and check the PDF before relying on any point.
When a challenge is strong
- The record is a communication with an outside party that has its own interests, not acting as a consultant without independent interests. Section 7(1)(f) exempts only inter- or intra-agency predecisional deliberative materials. Third-party submissions advancing their own interests are not such materials.Based on: n.d. · Tax incentive program applications · n.d. · Emails with a contractor about cu… · n.d. · Communications about scheduling m…
- The record contains purely factual information, not intertwined with predecisional discussions. Purely factual material is not exempt under section 7(1)(f) unless inextricably intertwined with predecisional discussions. The public body must prove that intertwining.Based on: n.d. · Property assessment documentation… · n.d. · An applicant's background check a… · n.d. · A slide deck on civil unrest emer…
+7 more
n.d. · Emails about a city-owned parking… · n.d. · Police use-of-force reports for 2… · n.d. · Police case reports and an intern… · n.d. · A transit district's bus driver p… · n.d. · Correspondence about state hiring… · n.d. · Emails about an investigation int… · n.d. · Construction cost projections for… - The record is a final policy, training material, or reflects a final decision, not predecisional. Records that disseminate established policy or reflect final decisions are not predecisional or deliberative, so they are not exempt under section 7(1)(f).Based on: n.d. · An administrative law judge bench… · n.d. · Budget reports by a state budget … · n.d. · A school official's emails about …
- The head of the public body publicly cited and identified the specific record to support a policy or course of action. The exemption is waived when the head of the public body publicly cites and identifies the record.Based on: n.d. · A budget comparison document pres…
When the public body usually wins
- The record is an internal communication (intra-agency or inter-agency with aligned interests) that is predecisional and reflects opinions, recommendations, or the give-and-take of the deliberative process. Such communications are exempt under section 7(1)(f) as predecisional deliberative material.Based on: n.d. · Communications and a legal memo f… · n.d. · Communications and a legal memo f… · n.d. · Emails about a city-owned parking…
- The record is a consultant's report containing predecisional opinions and recommendations, even if final, where factual content is intertwined with deliberative material. Consultant reports prepared to assist a public body's deliberative process fall within the exemption, even if the report is finished, when factual content is not severable from deliberative material.Based on: n.d. · Pension fund's redacted Real Esta… · n.d. · A consultant's study of a fire de… · n.d. · Consultant's review of university…
- The record is a preliminary draft or note reflecting mental impressions and deliberative process, not adopted as final. Preliminary notes and drafts are exempt under section 7(1)(f) as they reveal the deliberative process.Based on: n.d. · Draft advertisements for a public… · n.d. · Misconduct complaint records invo… · n.d. · Construction cost projections for…
- The head of the public body did not publicly cite and identify the specific record. Without public citation and identification by the head of the body, the exemption is not waived.Based on: n.d. · Applications, scores, and evaluat… · n.d. · Pension fund's redacted Real Esta… · n.d. · A consultant's study of a fire de…
Points to put in your letter
- If the record is a communication with an outside party that has its own interests, argue that it is not exempt because section 7(1)(f) only protects inter- or intra-agency predecisional materials, not third-party submissions advancing their own interests.Based on: n.d. · Tax incentive program applications · n.d. · Emails with a contractor about cu… · n.d. · Communications about scheduling m…
- If the record contains purely factual information, argue that factual material is not exempt unless inextricably intertwined with predecisional discussions, and the public body must prove that intertwining.Based on: n.d. · Property assessment documentation… · n.d. · An applicant's background check a… · n.d. · A slide deck on civil unrest emer…
+7 more
n.d. · Emails about a city-owned parking… · n.d. · Police use-of-force reports for 2… · n.d. · Police case reports and an intern… · n.d. · A transit district's bus driver p… · n.d. · Correspondence about state hiring… · n.d. · Emails about an investigation int… · n.d. · Construction cost projections for… - If the record is a final policy or training material, argue that it is not predecisional or deliberative because it reflects established policy.Based on: n.d. · An administrative law judge bench… · n.d. · Budget reports by a state budget …
- If the head of the public body publicly cited and identified the specific record, argue that the exemption has been waived.Based on: n.d. · A budget comparison document pres…
Common mistakes
- Assuming that any communication with a third party is exempt under 7(1)(f). The exemption only applies if the third party is acting as a consultant without independent interests.Based on: n.d. · Tax incentive program applications · n.d. · Emails with a contractor about cu… · n.d. · Communications about scheduling m…
- Assuming that purely factual material can be withheld as deliberative. Factual material is not exempt unless inextricably intertwined with predecisional discussions.Based on: n.d. · Property assessment documentation… · n.d. · An applicant's background check a… · n.d. · A slide deck on civil unrest emer…
+7 more
n.d. · Emails about a city-owned parking… · n.d. · Police use-of-force reports for 2… · n.d. · Police case reports and an intern… · n.d. · A transit district's bus driver p… · n.d. · Correspondence about state hiring… · n.d. · Emails about an investigation int… · n.d. · Construction cost projections for… - Arguing that the public interest in disclosure outweighs the exemption. Section 7(1)(f) does not involve a public interest balancing test.Based on: n.d. · Applications, scores, and evaluat…
- Assuming that a public body's general discussion of a topic waives the exemption for specific records. The head must publicly cite and identify the specific record.Based on: n.d. · Records on animal use in a medica… · n.d. · A consultant's study of a fire de…
Facts to gather first
- Whether the record was sent to or received from an outside party with its own interests (e.g., a contractor, union, community group).
- Whether the record contains only factual data, such as statistics, dates, or background information, without opinions or recommendations.
- Whether the head of the public body publicly mentioned or relied on the specific record in a public statement or meeting.
- Whether the record is a final version of a policy, training manual, or decision, rather than a draft.
These notes are based on non-binding determination letters; outcomes depend on specific facts, and you should verify the full text of any cited decision.
Drafting brief for an AI assistant
Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: foia-7-1-f.json.
Violation found (25)
Withholding third-party tax incentive applications under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) exempts only inter- or intra-agency predecisional deliberative materials; applications submitted by third parties to advance their own interests are not such materials.
Violation found Tax incentive program applications · June 13, 2025
Redaction of K-Five email under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) does not exempt communications with a third-party contractor whose interests are not aligned with the public body's interests.
Violation found Emails with a contractor about curb and gutter work · November 19, 2024
Redaction of emails with Illini Guardians and ICON
Rule: Third-party communications are exempt only if the third party acts as a consultant without independent interests; the University failed to meet its burden.
Violation found Athletic department correspondence with an NIL group · November 22, 2024
Denial of math calculations as work product
Rule: Purely factual material is not exempt under section 7(1)(f) unless intertwined with predecisional discussions; sales ratio statistics and assessment comments are factual and must be disclosed, but a handwritten calculation reflecting a preliminary step may be redacted.
Violation found Property assessment documentation and calculations · March 26, 2025
Withholding emails with employee under 7(1)(f)
Rule: Predecisional communications with an employee who is not part of the decision-making process are not deliberative and cannot be withheld under the deliberative process exemption.
Violation found Emails about a school employee's compensation · June 21, 2024
Section 7(1)(f) exemption for Bench Book
Rule: The Bench Book is established policy and training material, not predecisional deliberative material, so it is not exempt under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found An administrative law judge bench book on vehicle enforcement · March 17, 2023
Section 7(1)(f) redactions of slide deck
Rule: Factual material and final decisions are not exempt as deliberative; only predecisional opinions on slides 55 and 56 were properly withheld.
Violation found A slide deck on civil unrest emergency response strategies · October 13, 2022
Section 7(1)(f) withholding of background check records
Rule: Predecisional deliberative material may be withheld, but purely factual information and third-party opinions are not exempt.
Violation found An applicant's background check and polygraph records · May 15, 2024
Withholding inter-agency emails with Public Defender under 7(1)(f)
Rule: The deliberative process exemption does not apply to communications between public bodies with opposing interests, as they are not inter- or intra-agency.
Violation found Emails between four individuals over three months · July 18, 2023
Section 7(1)(f) redaction of Six Corners Chamber e-mail
Rule: A third-party communication with an entity representing independent interests is not exempt under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found Emails about a city-owned parking lot sale · September 27, 2022
Section 7(1)(f) redaction of utilization rate tables
Rule: Purely factual information not inextricably intertwined with predecisional discussions is not exempt under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found Emails about a city-owned parking lot sale · September 27, 2022
Section 7(1)(f) exemption for community communications
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) does not exempt unsolicited communications from third parties with independent interests that are not part of the public body's internal deliberative process.
Violation found Communications about scheduling make-up school days · September 11, 2023
Section 7(1)(f) deliberative process redaction
Rule: Factual use of force reports are not deliberative, but notations on whether force was effective may be redacted.
Violation found Police use-of-force reports for 2017 · September 13, 2018
Redacting inter-agency letter under deliberative process exemption
Rule: Because the letter's corrective actions are not privileged under the Medical Studies Act, they are not exempt as inter-agency communications under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found An internal investigation into a professor's research and IRB process · February 1, 2019
Section 7(1)(f) exemption for case status data
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) does not exempt purely factual material; CPD failed to show the case status data was deliberative.
Violation found Police case reports and an internal software manual · May 7, 2018
Draft contract proposals and language under 7(1)(f)
Rule: Draft proposals exchanged with a third-party union are not intra-agency deliberative material and are not exempt under 7(1)(f).
Violation found Draft contract language and salary schedules from union negotiations · June 30, 2016
Training records
Rule: Training records consisting of schedules and outlines with dates, times, instructor names, and routes are factual and not predecisional or deliberative.
Violation found A transit district's bus driver personnel file · April 13, 2018
Withholding emails under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Pre-decisional deliberative records may be withheld, but records reflecting a final decision are not exempt and must be disclosed.
Violation found A school official's emails about morning announcements · June 30, 2016
Withholding PowerPoint training materials under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Training materials that disseminate established policy are neither predecisional nor deliberative and are not exempt under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found Budget reports by a state budget office consultant · January 4, 2016
Section 7(1)(f) exemption for records concerning staffing communications
Rule: Records that are purely factual and do not reflect deliberative give-and-take are not exempt as predecisional deliberative material under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found Correspondence about state hiring sent to a revenue department · February 26, 2016
Section 7(1)(f) exemption for e-mails
Rule: E-mails exchanging factual information between an investigator and a school official are not predecisional deliberative material and cannot be withheld under the deliberative process exemption.
Violation found Emails about an investigation into a school district's finances · November 23, 2015
Withholding factual and third-party emails under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Purely factual material and communications sent to third parties do not reflect a deliberative process and are not exempt under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found Correspondence between a governor's office and a former agency director · March 31, 2016
Section 7(1)(f) preliminary drafts exemption for budget documents
Rule: A public body may not withhold preliminary drafts under section 7(1)(f) when the head of the body publicly cites and identifies the records, waiving the exemption.
Violation found A budget comparison document presented to a board · July 19, 2018
General contractor draft proposals as intra-agency records
Rule: A third party with its own financial interest in the decision is not part of the public body, so its proposals are not intra-agency records exempt under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found Construction cost projections for parking garages · December 31, 2013
City Manager memorandum to City Council
Rule: A memorandum that merely provides factual background and requests input, without expressing opinions or formulating policy, is not exempt under section 7(1)(f).
Violation found Construction cost projections for parking garages · December 31, 2013
No violation (26)
Redaction of emails on pending FOIA requests under 7(1)(f)
Rule: Emails among Department staff deliberating how to respond to FOIA requests are predecisional and deliberative, and thus exempt under section 7(1)(f).
No violation Communications and a legal memo from a city planning department · March 26, 2025
Redaction of emails on Zoning Board rules under 7(1)(f)
Rule: Emails between Department staff and alderman's office deliberating on Zoning Board rules are inter-agency predecisional communications exempt under section 7(1)(f).
No violation Communications and a legal memo from a city planning department · March 26, 2025
Withholding draft advertisements under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Unadopted versions of advertisements are preliminary drafts that reveal predecisional deliberative process, even if completed and paid for, so they are exempt from disclosure.
No violation Draft advertisements for a public safety sales tax · December 23, 2024
Redaction of predecisional deliberative records under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) exempts predecisional deliberative material even after the underlying policy proposal is not adopted or circumstances change.
No violation Internal communications on a property development project · August 2, 2024
Applicants' individual score sheets withheld under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Internal evaluator score sheets are predecisional and deliberative because they reflect employees' opinions later aggregated to derive final scores.
No violation Applications, scores, and evaluation notes for cultural districts program · November 22, 2024
Aggregate score sheet withheld under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Aggregate scores are predecisional deliberative material because they are not dispositive of the final designation decision.
No violation Applications, scores, and evaluation notes for cultural districts program · November 22, 2024
Public citation and identification waiver of section 7(1)(f)
Rule: No waiver because the head of DCEO did not publicly cite and identify the specific evaluative records, which did not exist at the time of the press conference.
No violation Applications, scores, and evaluation notes for cultural districts program · November 22, 2024
Public interest balancing under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) does not involve weighing the public interest in disclosure; it exempts predecisional and deliberative records regardless of public interest.
No violation Applications, scores, and evaluation notes for cultural districts program · November 22, 2024
Withholding employer response under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) exempts predecisional deliberative material, including third-party communications that play the same part in agency deliberation as internal documents.
No violation Communications about a police background investigation for employment · July 26, 2024
Redaction of Real Estate Strategic Plan under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Consultant reports containing predecisional opinions and recommendations relied upon by the public body are exempt under section 7(1)(f).
No violation Pension fund's redacted Real Estate Strategic Plan · February 13, 2024
Waiver of section 7(1)(f) by public citation and identification
Rule: The head of the public body did not publicly cite and identify the record, so the exemption was not waived.
No violation Pension fund's redacted Real Estate Strategic Plan · February 13, 2024
Whether redactions under section 7(1)(f) were proper
Rule: Predecisional and deliberative material related to the formulation of agency policy is exempt from disclosure.
No violation A mayor's text messages with city officials · March 23, 2022
Section 7(1)(f) redactions of internal deliberative communications
Rule: Predecisional and deliberative internal communications reflecting the give and take of the deliberative process are exempt under section 7(1)(f).
No violation Emails about a city-owned parking lot sale · September 27, 2022
Withholding draft and final Fire Study under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: A consultant's finished report prepared to assist a public body's deliberative process is exempt under section 7(1)(f), even if final, when factual content is intertwined with deliberative material.
No violation A consultant's study of a fire department's operations · September 9, 2021
Waiver of section 7(1)(f) by publicly citing and identifying the Fire Study
Rule: Approving invoices does not constitute publicly citing and identifying a record; the head of the public body must publicly refer to the record to support a policy or course of action.
No violation A consultant's study of a fire department's operations · September 9, 2021
Section 7(1)(f) withholding of notes and drafts
Rule: Preliminary notes and drafts reflecting mental impressions and deliberative process are exempt under 7(1)(f).
No violation Misconduct complaint records involving two city employees · August 31, 2020
Withholding of predecisional deliberative emails under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) exempts predecisional deliberative communications, including intertwined factual material, unless publicly cited by the public body's head.
No violation Correspondence about classroom observations and integration · February 7, 2019
Section 7(1)(f) exemption for consultant's report
Rule: A consultant's report reflecting predecisional and deliberative material is exempt from disclosure unless the head of the public body publicly cites and identifies it.
No violation Consultant's review of university athletics operations and contract · July 3, 2018
Withholding records under section 7(1)(f) deliberative process exemption
Rule: Section 7(1)(f) exempts predecisional, deliberative inter-agency communications expressing opinions or recommendations unless publicly cited by the public body head.
No violation Correspondence between state attorneys general on environmental policy · August 24, 2016
Confidential memorandum to Board under 7(1)(f)
Rule: A predecisional intra-agency memorandum containing analysis and recommendations is exempt under 7(1)(f) if not publicly cited by the public body's head.
No violation Draft contract language and salary schedules from union negotiations · June 30, 2016
Survey responses withheld under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Employee survey responses containing opinions used in a public body's deliberative decision-making process are predecisional materials exempt from disclosure under section 7(1)(f).
No violation An employee survey from 2015 · May 12, 2016
Withheld consultant records exempt as preliminary deliberative material
Rule: Consultant-prepared records reflecting predecisional intra-agency deliberation for a public body fall within the section 7(1)(f) preliminary records exemption.
No violation Technical specifications for a waste water treatment plant · September 25, 2015
Publicly cited and identified exception not triggered
Rule: The section 7(1)(f) exemption applies because the mayor, the head of the public body, did not cite or identify the withheld records.
No violation Technical specifications for a waste water treatment plant · September 25, 2015
Withholding deliberative predecisional records under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Predecisional inter-agency and intra-agency records expressing opinions or recommendations are exempt from disclosure when not publicly cited by the public body's head.
No violation Correspondence between a governor's office and a former agency director · March 31, 2016
Assistant City Manager's handwritten notes redaction
Rule: Predecisional notes reflecting an employee's opinions are exempt under section 7(1)(f) unless the head of the public body publicly cited and identified them.
No violation Construction cost projections for parking garages · December 31, 2013
Withholding of emails under section 7(1)(f)
Rule: Public statement about a subject without citing or identifying specific records does not waive the deliberative process exemption.
No violation Records on animal use in a medical residency program · February 21, 2017