This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

OMA section 2.02

OMA

5 ILCS 120/2.02. Section 2.02 overview: Detailed public-notice rules: post the year's regular meeting schedule at the start of each year, post an agenda at least 48 hours before each regular meeting (and on the body's website if it has staff-maintained one), and give appropriate notice for special or emergency meetings too.

12 issues across 10 determination letters:9 violation found · 2 no violation · 1 no determination / resolved.

Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.

Authorities the Bureau cites most on this issue

How to challenge a denial on this issue

AI-generated summary of the decisions listed on this page, with each point linked to the letters it comes from. Determination letters are not binding precedent and this is not legal advice. Open the letter and check the PDF before relying on any point.

When a challenge is strong

When the public body usually wins

  • The requester challenges a vote to present a report or to schedule a future meeting as final action taken without proper notice. Such votes are considered intermediate steps, not final action, so no 48-hour agenda notice is required.Based on: 2023 · Adding an agenda item less than 2…
  • The requester argues that the meeting agenda lacked the physical address of the meeting location. OMA does not require a meeting agenda to include the physical address.Based on: 2018 · Unannounced pre-meeting gathering…
  • The requester makes a vague allegation about a meeting without providing specific details (date, time, nature of business). Without sufficient facts, the Bureau cannot make a determination, leaving the body’s actions effectively unchallenged.Based on: 2017 · An advisory committee's special m…

Points to put in your letter

Common mistakes

Facts to gather first

  • The date, time, and type of meeting (regular, special, or committee).
  • Whether a majority of a quorum was present and public business was discussed.
  • Details about what final action was taken and whether it appeared on the agenda.
  • Evidence of whether and when the notice and agenda were posted (online, at the principal office, or elsewhere).

These notes are based on non-binding determination letters from the Public Access Bureau; the success of any challenge depends on the specific facts, so review the full decisions for context.

Drafting brief for an AI assistant

Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: oma-2-02.json.

Violation found (9)

No violation (2)

No determination / resolved (1)