This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

OMA section 2.06(a)

OMA

5 ILCS 120/2.06(a). Section 2.06 overview: Every body must keep written minutes of all meetings (open and closed) and a verbatim audio/video recording of closed sessions specifically. Open-meeting minutes must be approved within 30 days (or by the second subsequent regular meeting) and made public within 10 days after approval. This is the section that governs when closed-session minutes/recordings eventually have to be released too.

23 issues across 22 determination letters:16 violation found · 6 no violation · 1 no determination / resolved.

Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.

Authorities the Bureau cites most on this issue

How to challenge a denial on this issue

AI-generated summary of the decisions listed on this page, with each point linked to the letters it comes from. Determination letters are not binding precedent and this is not legal advice. Open the letter and check the PDF before relying on any point.

When a challenge is strong

When the public body usually wins

  • The challenge is based on de minimis inconsistencies (e.g., who made a motion, exact time of entering closed session) that do not deprive the public of meaningful information. The Bureau treats minor inaccuracies as insufficient to establish a violation where the public still receives a meaningful summary.Based on: 2024 · A village council's review of clo… · 2019 · County board minutes of closed-se…
  • The minutes lack a detailed description of an ordinance but no substantive discussion occurred on the matter. Minutes need only summarize discussion; if there is no discussion beyond identifying the ordinance, no further summary is required.Based on: 2019 · Meeting minutes describing an app…
  • The requester alleges a closed session recording is incomplete, but the public body produces a recording and evidence of no prior unrecorded deliberations, or evidence is conflicting. Absent evidence of missing portions, the Bureau will find compliance with the recording requirement.Based on: 2018 · A board member ordering a technic… · 2018 · Agenda items added to a special m…
  • The public body actually kept written minutes and the requester fails to show they were not kept. When the body demonstrates it kept minutes, a bare allegation of failure to keep them will not succeed.Based on: 2018 · Maintenance and storage of open s…

Points to put in your letter

Common mistakes

Facts to gather first

  • Date and type of meeting (regular, special, committee, subcommittee, closed session).
  • Whether you have searched for or requested minutes and received only an agenda or topic list, or nothing.
  • A description of any discussion you recall that is not captured in the minutes.
  • For a closed session, whether you requested the verbatim recording and what the body provided in response.

These non-binding determination letters apply only to specific facts; always review the full PDF and consider that similar facts might lead to a different outcome.

Drafting brief for an AI assistant

Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: oma-2-06-a.json.

Violation found (16)

No violation (6)

No determination / resolved (1)