This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

← Back to Opinions & Letters

OMADetermination Letter (non-binding)Closed no further actionMeeting Notices & Agendas

Algonquin Township Board's agenda notice for audit resolution found sufficient under OMA

The adequacy of an agenda item regarding a resolution requiring township-hired attorneys to carry malpractice insurance.

Date issued
June 28, 2018
Request number(s)
53636
Public body
Algonquin Township Board
Statute(s)
5 ILCS 120/2.02
Outcome
No violation found

Plain-language summary

This determination letter addresses whether the Algonquin Township Board violated section 2.02(c) of the Open Meetings Act by failing to adequately describe on its meeting agenda a resolution concerning audit authority over bill payments. The Public Access Bureau concluded that no violation occurred because the agenda item, which referenced a resolution requiring attorneys doing business with the Township to carry malpractice insurance, sufficiently conveyed the general subject matter of the resolution ultimately adopted, even though the resolution's title inaccurately described its substance. The Bureau applied the established rule that section 2.02(c) requires only disclosure of the general subject matter of anticipated final action, not its specific details or ultimate wording. Because the agenda adequately notified the public of the resolution's intended effect, the Bureau found no basis to conclude the Board violated OMA and closed the file without further action.

Legal question

Whether the Algonquin Township Board violated section 2.02(c) of the Open Meetings Act by failing to provide sufficient notice of a resolution on its meeting agenda.

Holding

An OMA section 2.02(c) agenda notice is sufficient if it identifies the general subject matter or intended effect of an anticipated resolution, even if the resolution's eventual title does not precisely match its substantive terms.

Summary

The requester alleged that the Algonquin Township Board violated the Open Meetings Act by voting on a resolution not properly listed on the meeting agenda. The PAC determined that the agenda item provided sufficient notice of the general subject matter and closed the file.

meeting agendapublic noticeOpen Meetings Acttownship board

Reading view (1,053 words)

This reading view follows the source PDF's positioned text blocks. Page headers, repeated office furniture, and lower-margin notes are kept out of the narrative; source notes are available below. Reconstruction is automatic and imperfect — the PDF is the authoritative version, and it's linked on this page.

Dear Mr. Allen:

The Public Access Bureau has received your Request for Review alleging a potential violation of the Open Meetings Act ( OMA) ( 5 ILCS 120/ 1 et seq. ( West 2016)) by the Algonquin Township Board ( Board). Your submission, however, does not include facts from which this office could conclude that the Board violated OMA.

part: Section 3. 5( a) of OMA (5 ILCS 120/3. 5( a) ( West 2016)) provides, in pertinent A person who believes that a violation of this Act by a public body has occurred may file a request for review with the Public Access Counselor established in the Office of the Attorney General not later 60 days after the alleged OMA violation. The request for review must be in writing, must be signed by the requester, and must include a summary of the facts supporting the allegation. ( Emphasis added.)

Your Request for Review alleges that at its June 13, 2018, meeting the Board adopted a resolution pertaining to their authority regarding the audit and payment of bills without placing that matter on the agenda as required by law. i' ( Emphasis in original.) Your submission included what appears to be an unsigned copy of the resolution, which is entitled:

2018). E-mail from Kirk Allen to Public Access [ Bureau, Office of the Attorney General] ( June 18, Resolution Recognizing Board' s Authorities [ sic] Regarding the Audit and Payment of Bills." The resolution states that the Board has authority, pursuant to section 80- 10 of the Township Code ( 60 ILCS 1/ 80- 10 West 2016)) to audit the Township' s and Township Road District' s accounts before paying bills, and that the Board will not approve the payment of bills for attorneys unless they carry at least $ 1 million in professional liability insurance and provide a release authorizing the Township to confirm their insurance coverage is in effect. You also provided a copy of the June 13, 2018, meeting agenda, which includes the following item: Resolution requesting all attorney' s [ sic] doing business with the Algonquin Township and Hwy. Dept. must carry malpractice insurance."

Section 2. 02( c) of OMA ( 5 ILCS 120/ 2. 02( c) ( West 2016)) provides, in pertinent part: " Any agenda required under this Section shall set forth the general subject matter of any resolution or ordinance that will be the subject of final action at the meeting." The Public Access Bureau has determined that "the General Assembly' s use of the term 'general subject matter' signifies that a meeting agenda must set forth the main element( s), rather than the specific details, of an item on which the public body intends to take final action." Ill. Att'y Gen. PAC Req. Rev. Ltr. 45667, issued February 16, 2017, at 4- 5 ( determining that agenda item appointment of the city administrator" did not violate section 2. 02( c) of OMA). Additionally, the Public Access Bureau has determined that the language of section 2. 02( c) of OMA "requires a public body' s agenda to identify the general subject matter of final action — not what particular action will be taken by a public body." Ill. Att'y Gen. PAC Req. Rev. Ltr. 39177, issued February 2, 2016, at 3- 4 ( determining that agenda item " Illinois Rt. 53/ 120 Project Environmental Impact Statement" did not violate section 2. 02( c) of OMA because by inclusion on the agenda, it could be inferred that the Board anticipated taking final action on the matter).

The title of the resolution that the Board approved at its June 13, 2018, meeting, arguably, does not accurately reflect its substance. The resolution identifies the source of the Board' s authority to audit and pay bills as section 80- 10 of the Township Code, which provides that "[ t] he township board shall meet at the township clerk's office for the purpose of examining and auditing the township and road district accounts before any bills * * * are paid[.] * * * The township board may consider and approve bills individually or in a summary statement of any number of bills." The substance of the resolution, however, concerns professional lability insurance, a type of which is malpractice insurance. 3 The resolution requires the Board to verify that attorneys who provided legal services carry professional liability insurance of at least $ 1 million before the Board exercises its statutory authority to approve the payment of bills for those attorneys' services. Even though the title of the resolution does not refer to professional liability insurance or malpractice insurance, the Board's agenda item clearly identifies the intended effect of the resolution— that attorneys hired by the Township carry malpractice insurance. Because the Board provided sufficient advance notice of the general subject matter of the resolution under section 2.02( c) of OMA, this office has determined that no further action is warranted as to this matter.

This file is closed. If you have questions, please contact me at ( 312) 814- 6756.

Very truly yours, STEVE SLIVERMAN Bureau Chief Public Access Bureau 53636 o no fi war twp cc: Via electronic mail The Honorable Charles A. Lutzlow, Jr. Township Supervisor Algonquin Township 3702 Highway 14 Crystal Lake, Illinois 60014 supervisor@algonquintownship. com

Notes from the original PDF (2)
  1. 100 West Randolph Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60601 • ( 312) 814- 3000 • TTY: ( 312) 814- 3374 • Fax: ( 312) 814- 3806 1001 East Main, Carbondale, Illinois 62901 • ( 618) 529- 6400 • TTY: ( 618) 529- 6403 • Fax: ( 618) 529- 6416
  2. 2Algonquin Township Board, unnumbered Agenda Item under " New Business[,]" Meeting (June 13, 2018). Malpractice insurance is defined as a "[ t]ype of liability insurance which protects professional people ( e.g. doctors, lawyers, accountants) against claims of negligence brought against them. Black's Law Dictionary 723 ( 5th ed. 1979).