This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

← Back to Opinions & Letters

FOIADetermination Letter (non-binding)Closed no further actionPublic Body Definition

PAC declines to decide Aurora Downtown's public body status due to pending litigation

The requester sought a determination on whether Aurora Downtown qualifies as a public body subject to FOIA and OMA requirements.

Date issued
July 15, 2024
Request number(s)
82071
Public body
Aurora Downtown
Statute(s)
5 ILCS 140/9.55 ILCS 120/3.5
Outcome
Closed, no further action

Plain-language summary

A former board member asked the Illinois Attorney General's office to decide if the organization 'Aurora Downtown' must follow state transparency laws. The Attorney General's office declined to intervene because the same question is already being decided in a pending lawsuit. As a result, the office closed the file without making a formal determination.

Legal question

Whether the Public Access Counselor should issue a determination regarding the status of an entity as a 'public body' while that issue is the subject of active litigation.

Summary

The requester asked the PAC to determine if Aurora Downtown is a public body subject to FOIA and OMA, but the PAC declined to act because the issue is currently being litigated in court.

public bodylitigationjurisdictiontransparency laws

Reading view (626 words)

This reading view follows the source PDF's positioned text blocks. Page headers, repeated office furniture, and lower-margin notes are kept out of the narrative; source notes are available below. Reconstruction is automatic and imperfect — the PDF is the authoritative version, and it's linked on this page.

Dear Ms. Salamone :

This letter is issued pursuant to section 3.5(e) of the Open Meetings Act (OMA) 5 ILCS 120/ 3.5(e) ( West 2022)) and section 9.5(f) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 ILCS 140/ 9.5(f) (West 2022), as amended by Public Act 103 -069, effective January 1, 2024 ). For the reasons explained below, the Public Access Bureau will take no further action with respect to the above -referenced Request for Review.

On July 8, 2024 , you submitted this Request for Review to the Public Access Bureau alleging that Aurora Downtown is out of compliance with FOIA and OMA . You noted that you are a former member of Aurora Downtown's Board of Directors, for which you took OMA training and responded to FOIA requests directed to the organization. You further noted that because of your activity on behalf of Aurora Downtown, you are a party to a lawsuit alleging, among other things, that Aurora Downtown is a public body subject to FOIA.1 In River Breeze, LLC v. Granholm , 2022 IL App ( 2d) 210704 , ¶¶ 40-41, the Illinois Appellate Court vacated the lower court's dismissal of a complaint that AuroraDowntown must abide by FOIA as Both FOIA2 and OMA3 provide that when the requester files suit with respect to the same alleged violation that is the subject of a pending Request for Review, the Public Access Counselor shall take no further action on the matter. Although you did not file the lawsuit in question , your Request for Review calls upon the Public Access Bureau to perform precisely the same factual analysis that the courts are currently performing in River Breeze, LLC v. Granholm . As an exercise of discretion in deference to the court proceeding, the Public Access Bureau will take no further action in this matter.4 Accordingly, this letter serves to close this file. If you have questions, please contact me at joshua. jones@ilag. gov.

Very truly yours, JOSHUA M. JONES Deputy Bureau Chief Public Access Bureau 82071 f and o dsc mun cc: Via electronic mail Mr. Brian Failing Board Chair Aurora Downtown 43 West Galena Boulevard Aurora, Illinois 60506 [email protected]

Notes from the original PDF (2)
  1. 1The Illinois Supreme Court has declared: " The definition of public body is substantially identical in both of those statutes. We find no reason to distinguish between the determination of a public body for purposes of the Open Meetings Act and the FOIA." Better Government Ass'nv. Illinois High School Ass'n, 2017 IL 121124, ¶ 25.
  2. 25 ILCS 140/ 9.5(g) (West 2022), as amended by Public Act 103 -069, effective January 1, 2024 . 35 ILCS 120/3.5(f) (West 2022). 45 ILCS 140/ 9.5(f) (West 2022), as amended by Public Act 103 -069, effective January 1, 2024 In responding to any request under this Section 9.5, the Attorney General may exercise his or her discretion and choose to resolve a request for review by mediation or by a means other than the issuance of a binding opinion ."); 5 ILCS 120/3.5(e) (West 2022) ("In responding to any written request under this Section 3.5, the Attorney General may exercise his orher discretion and choose to resolve a request for review by mediation or by a means other than the issuance of a binding opinion.").