This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

5 ILCS 120/2(c)(10)

OMA

Placement of individual students in special education

Placement of individual students in special education

Follow updates (RSS)

Read the full statute text on /statutes →

Jump to the 2 issues decided under this provision, with a drafting brief ↓

0 upheld (no violation found) · 1 rejected (violation found) · 1 partial violation, out of 2 documents.

Not legal advice, and not a per-exemption ruling — this reflects each document's overall disposition. See the FAQ disclaimer.

How the Public Access Counselor has treated 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(10)

Section 2(c)(10) of the Open Meetings Act permits a public body to hold a closed meeting to consider the placement of individual students in special education. It is a narrow exception tied to that specific placement topic, not a general provision for student issues.

In the decisions reviewed, the Public Access Counselor applied the exception narrowly. School boards were found to have violated the Act when they cited this exception to close meetings for student disciplinary cases, which fall under a different exception. In another matter, a village board was found to have violated the Act in part by failing to follow proper procedures for entering closed session and by discussing a matter outside the authorized exceptions.

At a glance: 2 documents from 2019 to 2023(0 binding opinions, 2 determination letters). Most often cited alongside: 5 ILCS 120/2(a) (Openness required) (1); 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) (Employee/contractor appointment, discipline, or performance) (1); 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(9) (Student disciplinary cases) (1); 5 ILCS 120/2(e) (Final action ban in closed session) (1).

Recurring issues

Practical points

Summary drafted from the linked decisions and checked against them; read the decisions themselves before relying on it. Not legal advice.

All 2 documents citing 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(10)

Issues decided under 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(10)

Individual questions the Public Access Bureau decided under this provision, with the rule it applied, grouped by outcome. Extracted automatically from the letters; check each source letter.

2 issues across 2 determination letters:1 violation found · 1 no violation.

Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.

Drafting brief for an AI assistant

Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: oma-2-c-10.json.

Violation found (1)

  • Incorrect OMA exception cited for closed sessions

    Rule: Student disciplinary cases must be closed under section 2(c)(9), not section 2(c)(10), because each exception has a distinct scope and must be strictly construed.

    Violation found Closed-session discussions of student disciplinary cases · June 9, 2023

No violation (1)