This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

5 ILCS 120/2(c)(15)

OMA

Professional ethics/performance review by a licensing advisory body

Professional ethics/performance review by a licensing advisory body

Follow updates (RSS)

Read the full statute text on /statutes →

Jump to the 2 issues decided under this provision, with a drafting brief ↓

1 upheld (no violation found) · 0 rejected (violation found), out of 1 documents.

Not legal advice, and not a per-exemption ruling — this reflects each document's overall disposition. See the FAQ disclaimer.

How the Public Access Counselor has treated 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(15)

At a glance: 1 document from 2020(0 binding opinions, 1 determination letter). Most often cited alongside: 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(4) (Evidence to a quasi-adjudicative body) (1).

All 1 document citing 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(15)

Issues decided under 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(15)

Individual questions the Public Access Bureau decided under this provision, with the rule it applied, grouped by outcome. Extracted automatically from the letters; check each source letter.

2 issues across 2 determination letters:1 violation found · 1 no determination / resolved.

Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.

Drafting brief for an AI assistant

Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: oma-2-c-15.json.

Violation found (1)

  • June 2, 2022 closed session reliance on section 2(c)(15)

    Rule: Section 2(c)(15) is limited to professional advisory groups appointed to assist licensing or regulatory agencies, and the Board does not fit that description.

    Violation found Closed-session discussion of audit status and rule changes · October 3, 2023

No determination / resolved (1)