DeKalb District 428 properly classified FOIA request as voluminous
The request sought extensive records regarding school busing errors, delays, and student transportation incidents.
- Date issued
- October 23, 2024
- Request number(s)
- 82943
- Public body
- DeKalb Community Unit School District 428
- Statute(s)
- 5 ILCS 140/2
- Outcome
- Closed, no further action
Plain-language summary
A requester asked a school district for a wide range of documents related to busing problems. The school district classified the request as 'voluminous' because it covered many different categories of records, and the Attorney General's office agreed that the district followed the law in doing so. This means the district is allowed to follow the specific, more restrictive procedures that apply to voluminous FOIA requests.
Legal question
Whether the school district properly classified a FOIA request as a 'voluminous request' under section 2(h) of FOIA.
Holding
The District acted within its authority under FOIA to treat the request as a voluminous request, and no further action is warranted.
Summary
The requester sought various records regarding school busing issues, and the PAC determined that the school district properly classified the request as a 'voluminous request' under FOIA.
Reading view (1,541 words)
This reading view follows the source PDF's positioned text blocks. Page headers, repeated office furniture, and lower-margin notes are kept out of the narrative; source notes are available below. Reconstruction is automatic and imperfect — the PDF is the authoritative version, and it's linked on this page.
Dear
This determination is issued pursuant to section 9.5(c) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) ( 5 ILCS 140/ 9.5(c) ( West 2023 Supp.)). For the reasons set forth below, the Public Access Bureau has determined that no further action is warranted.
On August 22, 2024, you submitted a FOIA request to DeKalb Community Unit School District 428 ( District) seeking copies of the following:
A]ll records, communications, reports, and other documents related to bussing issues that have occurred since the beginning of the 2024- 2025 school year within DeKalb Community Unit School District 428. This request includes incidents involving any students who may have experienced bussing errors, delays, or misidentifications.
Specifically, I am requesting:
1. All internal and external communications (including emails, memos, and phone call records) between school staff, transportation staff, and any third parties related to bussing issues since the start of the 2024- 2025 school year. 2. Records from Skyward or any other student information system reflecting the transportation schedules and any updates On April 29, 2024, the District notified you that your FOIA request was voluminous because your request sought at least five categories of records. The District advised that you had ten business days to amend your request such that it would no longer be a voluminous request, and that if it did not receive an amended request, it would respond to your request and may assess permissible fees.
On August 30, 2024, you provided the District with an amended FOIA request, which removed the portion of your request seeking records regarding delays. On September 9, 2024, the District notified you that your amended FOIA request continued to be voluminous because your request sought at least five categories of records and an initial search for e-mail records yielded thousands of records. On September 12, 2024, you submitted a completed Request for Review which appears to contest the District' s notification that your request is voluminous.2 Second, you appear to contest the District' s ability to charge fees for records. Section 3.6(c) of FOIA provides four options for a public body's response, including providing the requester with an estimate of the fees to be charged; FOIA does not require a public body to waive copying fees for voluminous requests even if disclosure of the records would further a public interest. Regardless, the District' s September 9, 2024, response did not provide an estimate of fees, but rather notified you that your amended FOIA request was unduly burdensome pursuant to section 3(g) of FOIA ( 5 ILCS 140/ 3(g) (West 2022)) and offered you an opportunity to confer with it to help you reduce the scope of your request. This office notes that in your amended FOIA request you mentioned that you were especially interested in the two incidents reported at the School Board meeting. Accordingly, you may wish to submit a new FOIA request to the District seeking records pertaining to the two incidents, describing the two incidents with as much detail available to you, and providing a specific time frame for the search. 4 Third, you appear to contest the District' s designation of your amended FOIA request as voluminous because it seems unlikely that there are thousands of records over a two- to-three- week period. Section 2(h) of FOIA ( 5 ILCS 140/2(h) (West 2023 Supp.)) defines voluminous request" as a request that:
i) includes more than 5 individual requests for more than 5 different categories of records or a combination of individual ii) requires the compilation of more than 500 letter or legal- sized pages of public records unless a single requested record exceeds 500 pages. "Single requested record" may include, but is not limited to, one report, form, e-mail, letter, memorandum, book, map, microfilm, tape, or recording. (Emphasis added.)
Although your Request for Review appears to contest the District's designation of your Request for Review as voluminous because you do not think that there could be thousands of records, a public body may designate a request as voluminous when a request seeks more than five different categories of records. 5 Your amended request seeks at least six different categories of records, including, but not limited to: (1) internal and external communications regarding busing issues; ( 2) records from Skyward or any other student information system; ( 3) records pertaining to bus rides; (4) incident reports; (5) notes or records from meetings; and (6) communications between school staff and law enforcement officers. Thus, regardless of whether your amended request requires the compilation of more than 500 pages of records, it qualifies as a "voluminous request" under the definition of that term in section 2(h) of FOIA because of the number of categories of records it seeks. Because your request seeks at least six different categories of records, FOIA authorized the District to treat your request as a voluminous request, and the Public Access Bureau has determined that no further action is warranted in this matter.
This file is closed. If you have any questions, please contact me at 312-814-5201, edie.steinberg@ilag. gov, or at the Chicago address listed on the bottom of the first page of this letter.
Very truly yours, EDIE STEINBERG Senior Assistant Attorney General Public Access Bureau 82943 f no fi war sd
Notes from the original PDF (3)
- 1E-mail from to [DeKalb Community Unit School District 428] (August 22, 2024). 2On September 18, 2024, you sent this office additional correspondence pertaining to video footage from a school bus that the District informed you that it does not possess or maintain. Your correspondence did not ask this office to review the District's response, did not provide a signed Request for Review, and did not provide a copy of the FOIA request; therefore, this office treated that correspondence as information for the above - referenced Request for Review. We note, however, that "[ a] requester is entitled only to records that an agency has in fact chosen to create and retain." Yeager v. Drug Enforcement Administration, 678 F.2d 315, 321 (D.C. Cir.
- 1982); see also Workmann v. Illinois State Board of Education, 229 Ill. App. 3d 459, 463-64 (1992) (a public body does not violate FOIA when it does not disclose a record that it does not possess). 3Business days exclude weekends and certain holidays, such as labor day, which fell on September 2, 2024. 4This office notes that parts of your August 22, 2024, FOIA request and parts of your August 30, 2024, amended FOIA request ask for records with a time frame and other parts do not include a time frame for the records requested. In the future you may wish to be more specific. See Manna v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 106 F. Supp. 3d 16, 19 (D.D.C. 2015) (public bodies are not required to search beyond the four corners of a FOIA request, nor are they required to divine the requester's intent).
- 5Webster' s Third New International Dictionary defines "category" as " a class, group, or classification of any kind[.]" Webster's Third New International Dictionary 352 (1993).
Related opinions
Same exemption or subject category.
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsFees for electronic delivery of police reports2025 PAC 89267 · City of Markham · 2025
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsPolice fee assessment for redacting camera footage2025 PAC 88767 · Mattoon Police Department · 2025
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsEmails about a former library branch property2023 PAC 75559 · City of Chicago Department of Planning and Development · 2023
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsRecords of flood-related home buyout programs2023 PAC 76033 · St. Clair County · 2023
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsRecords of attorney's fees paid to an outside firm2022 PAC 74070 · Cook County State's Attorney's Office · 2022
- FOIA+OMABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsSubpoenas received by a police department2020 PAC 65160 · Chicago Police Department · 2021
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsEmails about appointments to state boards2018 PAC 54430 · State Board of Education · 2018
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsEmails between a city official and planning consultants2016 PAC 43069 · City of Collinsville · 2016
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsInvoices for legal services to a city2014 PAC 27500 · City of Urbana · 2014
- FOIABindingFees & Burdensome RequestsA contractor's records of a governmental function2013 PAC 25736 · City of Martinsville · 2013