OMA section 2(d)

OMA

Definitions for closed-meeting exceptions

5 ILCS 120/2(d). Definitions for closed-meeting exceptions

1 issue across 1 determination letter:1 violation found.

Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.

Drafting brief for an AI assistant

Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: oma-2-d.json.

TOPIC: 5 ILCS 120/2(d) - Definitions for closed-meeting exceptions
SOURCE: Illinois Attorney General Public Access Bureau decisions compiled at https://illinoisfoia.org/provisions/oma-2-d/
NOTE: Determination letters are not binding precedent; they show how the Bureau applies the law. Verify every decision against the source PDF before citing it.

VIOLATION FOUND (1):
- Quasi-adjudicative body status does not exempt Board from OMA
  Rule: OMA does not exempt quasi-adjudicative bodies from its requirements; they may only close meetings in compliance with OMA procedures.
  Decision: A board's closed-session discussion of policy recommendations (non-binding determination letter, January 19, 2022) https://illinoisfoia.org/opinions/letter-68599/



TASK FOR THE ASSISTANT: Using only the decisions above, help draft a letter. Argue from the rule and cite the decision by name and date. Do not invent decisions.

Violation found (1)

Quasi-adjudicative body status does not exempt Board from OMA
Rule: OMA does not exempt quasi-adjudicative bodies from its requirements; they may only close meetings in compliance with OMA procedures.
Violation found A board's closed-session discussion of policy recommendations · January 19, 2022