This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

7.5(q)

FOIA

Made confidential by the Personnel Record Review Act

Made confidential by the Personnel Record Review Act

Follow updates (RSS)

Read the full statute text on /statutes →

Jump to the 6 issues decided under this provision, with a drafting brief ↓

0 upheld (no violation found) · 3 rejected (violation found) · 2 closed / insufficient info / other, out of 5 documents.

Not legal advice, and not a per-exemption ruling — this reflects each document's overall disposition. See the FAQ disclaimer.

How the Public Access Counselor has treated 7.5(q)

Section 7.5(q) incorporates confidentiality protections found in other Illinois statutes. In these decisions, the relevant statute was the Personnel Record Review Act, which was invoked for performance evaluations, complaints against staff, and other personnel disciplinary material.

Requests involved schools, a park district, and other public bodies seeking evaluations, complaints, and personnel files. The PAC did not treat all personnel material the same. It upheld withholding of actual performance evaluations, but found a notice to remedy attached to a board resolution was not a confidential evaluation and found complaints that were not formal disciplinary actions did not qualify. Other matters were resolved on different grounds, such as privacy redactions or the absence of a duty to create aggregated records.

At a glance: 5 documents(0 binding opinions, 5 determination letters). Most often cited alongside: 7(1)(a) (Confidential under other federal or State law) (3); 7(1)(b) (Private information) (2); 7(1)(c) (Personal privacy) (2); 7(1)(j)(ii) (Peer evaluation of faculty) (1); 7(1)(q) (Licensing/employment exam questions and scoring keys) (1).

Recurring issues

Practical points

Summary drafted from the linked decisions and checked against them; read the decisions themselves before relying on it. Not legal advice.

All 5 documents citing 7.5(q)

Issues decided under 7.5(q)

Individual questions the Public Access Bureau decided under this provision, with the rule it applied, grouped by outcome. Extracted automatically from the letters; check each source letter.

6 issues across 5 determination letters:2 violation found · 4 no violation.

Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.

Authorities the Bureau cites most on this issue

How to challenge a denial on this issue

AI-generated summary of the decisions listed on this page, with each point linked to the letters it comes from. Determination letters are not binding precedent and this is not legal advice. Open the letter and check the PDF before relying on any point.

When a challenge is strong

  • The public body withheld records of complaints against staff that did not result in discipline. Records that do not document the imposition of discipline are not exempt under section 7.5(q) and section 8 of the PRRA.Based on: Complaints and disciplinary records of school s…
  • The public body withheld investigatory records (such as underlying investigation materials) rather than the actual disciplinary decision. Section 7.5(q) incorporates only PRRA section 8, which exempts records documenting the imposition of discipline, not the investigatory file.Based on: Disciplinary records and citizen complaints for…

When the public body usually wins

Points to put in your letter

  • If the records you requested are complaints that did not lead to discipline, argue that they do not 'document the imposition of discipline' and therefore are not exempt under section 7.5(q) and section 8 of the Personnel Record Review Act.Based on: Complaints and disciplinary records of school s…
  • If the public body withheld investigatory records, point out that section 7.5(q) only exempts records documenting the imposition of discipline, not the underlying investigation.Based on: Disciplinary records and citizen complaints for…
  • If the public body claims the performance evaluation exemption, check whether the records are actually periodic comprehensive performance evaluations. Specific instances of misconduct are not protected by section 11 of the PRRA.Based on: An applicant's background check and polygraph r…

Common mistakes

Facts to gather first

  • Whether the requested records are performance evaluations, complaints, investigatory files, or disciplinary records.
  • If disciplinary records, the date the discipline was imposed (to determine if more than four years old).
  • Whether the records document the actual imposition of discipline or are only complaints or investigation materials.
  • The specific exemption cited by the public body in its denial letter.

These notes are based on a limited set of non-binding determination letters; outcomes depend on specific facts and the current state of the law. Always verify the full PDF decisions.

Drafting brief for an AI assistant

Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: foia-7-5-q.json.

Violation found (2)

  • Withholding complaint records not reflecting disciplinary action

    Rule: Records of complaints against staff that do not document the imposition of discipline are not exempt under section 7.5(q).

    Violation found Complaints and disciplinary records of school staff · June 1, 2023

  • Withholding investigatory records under FOIA 7.5(q) and PRRA

    Rule: Section 7.5(q) incorporates only PRRA section 8, which permits deletion of records documenting the imposition of discipline, not underlying investigatory records.

    Violation found Disciplinary records and citizen complaints for three police officers · February 11, 2016

No violation (4)

  • Withholding seasonal performance evaluations under FOIA

    Rule: Section 11 of the Personnel Record Review Act prohibits disclosure of performance evaluations in response to a FOIA request, so the District properly withheld them.

    No violation Seasonal performance evaluations and interview scoring records · May 8, 2024

  • Section 7.5(q) withholding of performance evaluations

    Rule: Section 11 of the PRRA prohibits disclosure of periodic comprehensive performance evaluations, but not specific instances of misconduct.

    No violation An applicant's background check and polygraph records · May 15, 2024

  • Withholding disciplinary records more than four years old

    Rule: Section 8 of the PRRA permits withholding records documenting the imposition of discipline that are more than four years old.

    No violation Complaints and disciplinary records of school staff · June 1, 2023

  • Performance evaluations

    Rule: Performance evaluations are exempt from disclosure under section 7.5(q) of FOIA and section 11 of the PRRA.

    No violation A transit district's bus driver personnel file · April 13, 2018