7.5(r)
FOIAMade confidential by the Illinois School Student Records Act
Made confidential by the Illinois School Student Records Act
Read the full statute text on /statutes →
Jump to the 7 issues decided under this provision, with a drafting brief ↓
0 upheld (no violation found) · 1 rejected (violation found) · 4 closed / insufficient info / other, out of 5 documents.
Not legal advice, and not a per-exemption ruling — this reflects each document's overall disposition. See the FAQ disclaimer.
How the Public Access Counselor has treated 7.5(r)
Section 7.5(r) applies when another Illinois law specifically makes records confidential and bars disclosure under FOIA. In these decisions, the laws most often cited were the Illinois School Student Records Act for student-related records, and the School Code and the Personnel Record Review Act for teacher evaluation records.
The Public Access Counselor generally agreed that anecdotal teacher notes about students, student incident and discipline reports, and teacher evaluation performance results were protected and properly withheld, even when requesters suggested redacting names. A parent request for a child's school records was also treated as governed by the student-records law rather than FOIA. In one case, however, the Counselor found a violation where a district redacted enrollment counts of fewer than 10 without showing that disclosure would invade privacy or violate student-record protections.
At a glance: 5 documents(0 binding opinions, 5 determination letters). Most often cited alongside: 7(1)(a) (Confidential under other federal or State law) (2); 7(1)(b) (Private information) (1); 7(1)(c) (Personal privacy) (1); 7(1)(j)(ii) (Peer evaluation of faculty) (1).
Recurring issues
- Whether small student enrollment counts of fewer than 10 per school can be withheld to prevent identifying students. (Student enrollment counts by feeder grammar school)
- Whether teachers' anecdotal notes about student behavior are protected student records. (Teacher anecdotal notes on student behaviors)
- Whether teacher evaluation performance results remain exempt even if personal identifiers are removed. (Teacher evaluation performance task results)
- Whether student incident and discipline reports can be withheld because details would still identify students after redaction. (Incident reports and disciplinary records of student altercations)
- Whether a parent's request for a child's school records is handled under FOIA or under the student-records law. (A school district's communications about a student harassment complaint)
Practical points
- A public body that withholds small cell-size enrollment numbers should explain with evidence how disclosure would identify students or violate privacy protections.
- A requester seeking a child's school records may need to follow the procedures of the student-records law rather than FOIA.
- A public body withholding records under this provision should identify the specific confidentiality law that applies, such as the student-records law, the School Code, or the Personnel Record Review Act.
- Removing names alone may not make student incident reports or teacher evaluation records available if another statute protects them from disclosure.
Summary drafted from the linked decisions and checked against them; read the decisions themselves before relying on it. Not legal advice.
All 5 documents citing 7.5(r)
- Student enrollment counts by feeder grammar schoolDetermination letter · Violation found
Improperly withheld records
- Teacher anecdotal notes on student behaviorsDetermination letter · Closed no further action
Closed, no further action
- Teacher evaluation performance task resultsDetermination letter · Closed no further action
Closed, no further action
- Incident reports and disciplinary records of student altercationsDetermination letter · Closed no further action
Closed, no further action
- A school district's communications about a student harassment complaintDetermination letter · Closed no further action
Closed, no further action
Issues decided under 7.5(r)
Individual questions the Public Access Bureau decided under this provision, with the rule it applied, grouped by outcome. Extracted automatically from the letters; check each source letter.
7 issues across 7 determination letters:2 violation found · 4 no violation · 1 no determination / resolved.
Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.
Authorities the Bureau cites most on this issue
- Bowie v. Evanston Community Consolidated School District No. 65, 128 Ill. 2d 373 (1989) cited 3 times
- De-identified student test scores (Pub. Acc. Op. No. 12-014) cited 1 times
- Teacher anecdotal notes on student behaviors (PAC Req. Rev. Ltr. 61177) cited 1 times
How to challenge a denial on this issue
AI-generated summary of the decisions listed on this page, with each point linked to the letters it comes from. Determination letters are not binding precedent and this is not legal advice. Open the letter and check the PDF before relying on any point.
When a challenge is strong
- The public body claims a record is a student record, but the record contains no information that could identify a specific student. Records without attributes that can identify individual students are not exempt student records under ISSRA, so the denial cannot stand solely on that basis.Based on: Student enrollment counts by feeder grammar sch…
- The public body withholds a video or other record under the student record exemption without showing it was actually used and maintained as part of a student's record. Security videos and similar records are only school student records if officials use and maintain them as part of a student's record; failing to prove that connection makes the exemption inapplicable.Based on: Security camera footage from a school event · Surveillance video of minors in a school gymnas…
When the public body usually wins
- The records document a specific student's behavior or performance and cannot be sufficiently redacted to prevent identification. Records that still identify the student even after redaction are exempt student records under ISSRA and may be withheld.Based on: Incident reports and disciplinary records of st…
- The records are teacher anecdotal notes or similar materials that inherently could identify individual students. Such notes are exempt student records under ISSRA because they contain identifiable student information.Based on: Teacher anecdotal notes on student behaviors
- The public body redacts all information that would identify individual students and then discloses the record. Redaction of student-identifying information satisfies ISSRA, so the denial of the unredacted record is not a violation.Based on: A settlement agreement and remedial warning for…
Points to put in your letter
- Point out that the record does not contain any information that can identify a specific student, so the student-record exemption should not apply.Based on: Student enrollment counts by feeder grammar sch…
- Ask the public body to redact any student-identifying information rather than withholding the entire record.Based on: A settlement agreement and remedial warning for…
- Demand that the public body show the record was actually used and maintained as part of a student's record if they claim ISSRA protection.Based on: Security camera footage from a school event
Common mistakes
- Assuming all school-related records are automatically student records exempt from FOIA.Based on: Security camera footage from a school event · Surveillance video of minors in a school gymnas…
- Failing to ask for redaction of student identifiers when the record contains some personal information.Based on: A settlement agreement and remedial warning for…
- Using FOIA to request your own child's school records instead of filing under the Illinois School Student Records Act.Based on: A school district's communications about a stud…
Facts to gather first
- Whether the record contains any student name, number, or other identifier.
- Whether the record (especially a video) was used for student discipline or placed in a student's file.
- Whether the record can be redacted to remove identifying details while leaving the rest responsive.
These decision letters are non-binding and fact-specific; verify the original PDF to see the full context and how similar facts may differ.
Drafting brief for an AI assistant
Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: foia-7-5-r.json.
Violation found (2)
Section 7.5(r) ISSRA student record exemption
Rule: CPS failed to show the video became part of a student's record, so it did not prove the ISSRA exemption applied.
Violation found Security camera footage from a school event · April 19, 2022
Redaction of student cell size counts under 10
Rule: CPS failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that student cell size counts under 10 are exempt under section 7.5(r) because the records contain no attributes that could identify individual students.
Violation found Student enrollment counts by feeder grammar school · October 3, 2017
No violation (4)
Denial of student disciplinary records under ISSRA exemption
Rule: Records documenting specific student behavior cannot be sufficiently redacted to prevent identification, so ISSRA prohibits their disclosure.
No violation Incident reports and disciplinary records of student altercations · October 1, 2024
Denial of teacher anecdotal notes as student records
Rule: Records from which individual students could be identified are exempt student records under ISSRA and may be withheld under FOIA section 7.5(r).
No violation Teacher anecdotal notes on student behaviors · January 3, 2020
Video recordings as school student records under section 7.5(r)
Rule: Video recordings created for security purposes are not school student records unless officials use and maintain them as part of a student's record.
No violation Surveillance video of minors in a school gymnasium · October 19, 2018
Redaction of student-identifying information under ISSRA
Rule: ISSRA does not prohibit disclosure of records if information identifying individual students is redacted.
No violation A settlement agreement and remedial warning for a tenured teacher · August 25, 2016
No determination / resolved (1)
Parent's request for child's school records governed by ISSRA, not FOIA
Rule: School student records are exempt from FOIA and must be requested under ISSRA, which provides the sole process for parental access.
No determination / resolved A school district's communications about a student harassment complaint · February 7, 2025