This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

7.5(r)

FOIA

Made confidential by the Illinois School Student Records Act

Made confidential by the Illinois School Student Records Act

Follow updates (RSS)

Read the full statute text on /statutes →

Jump to the 7 issues decided under this provision, with a drafting brief ↓

0 upheld (no violation found) · 1 rejected (violation found) · 4 closed / insufficient info / other, out of 5 documents.

Not legal advice, and not a per-exemption ruling — this reflects each document's overall disposition. See the FAQ disclaimer.

How the Public Access Counselor has treated 7.5(r)

Section 7.5(r) applies when another Illinois law specifically makes records confidential and bars disclosure under FOIA. In these decisions, the laws most often cited were the Illinois School Student Records Act for student-related records, and the School Code and the Personnel Record Review Act for teacher evaluation records.

The Public Access Counselor generally agreed that anecdotal teacher notes about students, student incident and discipline reports, and teacher evaluation performance results were protected and properly withheld, even when requesters suggested redacting names. A parent request for a child's school records was also treated as governed by the student-records law rather than FOIA. In one case, however, the Counselor found a violation where a district redacted enrollment counts of fewer than 10 without showing that disclosure would invade privacy or violate student-record protections.

At a glance: 5 documents(0 binding opinions, 5 determination letters). Most often cited alongside: 7(1)(a) (Confidential under other federal or State law) (2); 7(1)(b) (Private information) (1); 7(1)(c) (Personal privacy) (1); 7(1)(j)(ii) (Peer evaluation of faculty) (1).

Recurring issues

Practical points

Summary drafted from the linked decisions and checked against them; read the decisions themselves before relying on it. Not legal advice.

All 5 documents citing 7.5(r)

Issues decided under 7.5(r)

Individual questions the Public Access Bureau decided under this provision, with the rule it applied, grouped by outcome. Extracted automatically from the letters; check each source letter.

7 issues across 7 determination letters:2 violation found · 4 no violation · 1 no determination / resolved.

Counts are per issue, not per letter, and come from automated extraction checked against sampled letters. Determination letters are not binding precedent.

Authorities the Bureau cites most on this issue

How to challenge a denial on this issue

AI-generated summary of the decisions listed on this page, with each point linked to the letters it comes from. Determination letters are not binding precedent and this is not legal advice. Open the letter and check the PDF before relying on any point.

When a challenge is strong

  • The public body claims a record is a student record, but the record contains no information that could identify a specific student. Records without attributes that can identify individual students are not exempt student records under ISSRA, so the denial cannot stand solely on that basis.Based on: Student enrollment counts by feeder grammar sch…
  • The public body withholds a video or other record under the student record exemption without showing it was actually used and maintained as part of a student's record. Security videos and similar records are only school student records if officials use and maintain them as part of a student's record; failing to prove that connection makes the exemption inapplicable.Based on: Security camera footage from a school event · Surveillance video of minors in a school gymnas…

When the public body usually wins

  • The records document a specific student's behavior or performance and cannot be sufficiently redacted to prevent identification. Records that still identify the student even after redaction are exempt student records under ISSRA and may be withheld.Based on: Incident reports and disciplinary records of st…
  • The records are teacher anecdotal notes or similar materials that inherently could identify individual students. Such notes are exempt student records under ISSRA because they contain identifiable student information.Based on: Teacher anecdotal notes on student behaviors
  • The public body redacts all information that would identify individual students and then discloses the record. Redaction of student-identifying information satisfies ISSRA, so the denial of the unredacted record is not a violation.Based on: A settlement agreement and remedial warning for…

Points to put in your letter

Common mistakes

Facts to gather first

  • Whether the record contains any student name, number, or other identifier.
  • Whether the record (especially a video) was used for student discipline or placed in a student's file.
  • Whether the record can be redacted to remove identifying details while leaving the rest responsive.

These decision letters are non-binding and fact-specific; verify the original PDF to see the full context and how similar facts may differ.

Drafting brief for an AI assistant

Copy this into your assistant to help draft a request, appeal, or challenge to a denial that turns on this issue. It carries the rules and decisions, not your facts: add those yourself. Machine-readable version: foia-7-5-r.json.

Violation found (2)

  • Section 7.5(r) ISSRA student record exemption

    Rule: CPS failed to show the video became part of a student's record, so it did not prove the ISSRA exemption applied.

    Violation found Security camera footage from a school event · April 19, 2022

  • Redaction of student cell size counts under 10

    Rule: CPS failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that student cell size counts under 10 are exempt under section 7.5(r) because the records contain no attributes that could identify individual students.

    Violation found Student enrollment counts by feeder grammar school · October 3, 2017

No violation (4)

  • Denial of student disciplinary records under ISSRA exemption

    Rule: Records documenting specific student behavior cannot be sufficiently redacted to prevent identification, so ISSRA prohibits their disclosure.

    No violation Incident reports and disciplinary records of student altercations · October 1, 2024

  • Denial of teacher anecdotal notes as student records

    Rule: Records from which individual students could be identified are exempt student records under ISSRA and may be withheld under FOIA section 7.5(r).

    No violation Teacher anecdotal notes on student behaviors · January 3, 2020

  • Video recordings as school student records under section 7.5(r)

    Rule: Video recordings created for security purposes are not school student records unless officials use and maintain them as part of a student's record.

    No violation Surveillance video of minors in a school gymnasium · October 19, 2018

  • Redaction of student-identifying information under ISSRA

    Rule: ISSRA does not prohibit disclosure of records if information identifying individual students is redacted.

    No violation A settlement agreement and remedial warning for a tenured teacher · August 25, 2016

No determination / resolved (1)