This site is a research reference, not legal advice. See the FAQ disclaimer for details.

← Back to Opinions & Letters

OMADetermination Letter (non-binding)Closed no further actionMeeting Notices & Agendas

Sangamon Valley Water Board did not violate OMA by not explicitly stating final action on contract

The adequacy of an agenda item regarding the approval of a contract by a public water district board.

Date issued
April 21, 2023
Request number(s)
76015
Public body
Sangamon Valley Public Water District Board of Trustees
Statute(s)
5 ILCS 120/2.02(c)
Outcome
Closed, no further action

Plain-language summary

A citizen complained that a local water district board voted on a contract without properly warning the public on the meeting agenda that a vote would occur. The Attorney General's office reviewed the agenda and concluded that the board provided enough information to satisfy the law. This means the board's action was legally sufficient, and no further action will be taken.

Legal question

Whether a public body violates section 2.02(c) of the Open Meetings Act by failing to explicitly state on an agenda that it intends to take final action on a contract.

Holding

The Board did not violate the Open Meetings Act because the agenda sufficiently described the general subject matter of the contract, even without explicitly stating that final action would be taken.

Summary

The requester alleged that the Sangamon Valley Public Water District Board of Trustees violated the Open Meetings Act by failing to specify on its agenda that it intended to take final action on a contract. The PAC determined that the agenda provided sufficient notice of the general subject matter as required by law.

meeting agendapublic noticevotingwater district

Reading view (801 words)

This reading view follows the source PDF's positioned text blocks. Page headers, repeated office furniture, and lower-margin notes are kept out of the narrative; source notes are available below. Reconstruction is automatic and imperfect — the PDF is the authoritative version, and it's linked on this page.

Dear Mr. Bambenek:

This determination is issued pursuant to section 3.5(b) of the Open Meetings Act OMA) ( 5 ILCS 120/ 3.5(b) (West 2020)). For the reasons explained below, this office has determined that no further action is warranted as to this matter.

On March 27, 2023, you submitted the above-referenced Request for Review alleging that the Sangamon Valley Public Water District Board of Trustees ( Board) violated OMA at its March 27, 2023, meeting by voting to approve a contract listed on the agenda but failing to indicate that it would take action on the item. This office construes your Request for Review as alleging a violation of section 2.02(c) of OMA (5 ILCS 120/2.02(c) (West 2020)). You provided this office with the meeting agenda and a link to a video of the meeting.

Section 3.5(a) of OMA ( 5 ILCS 120/3.5(a) ( West 2020)) provides that "[ a] person who believes that a violation of this Act by a public body has occurred may file a request for review with the Public Access Counselor[,]" and that the submission " must include a summary of the facts supporting the allegation." Section 2.02(c) of OMA provides, in pertinent part: Any agenda required under this Section shall set forth the general subject matter of any resolution or ordinance that will be the subject of final action at the meeting." (Emphasis added.) The Public Access Bureau has determined that " the General Assembly' s use of the term ' general subject matter' signifies that a meeting agenda must set forth the main element(s), rather than the specific details, of an item on which the public body intends to take final action." Ill. Att'y Gen. PAC Req. Rev. Ltr. 45667, issued February 16, 2017, at 4-5 (determining that agenda item appointment of the city administrator" adequately described the general subject matter of public body' s final action to approve a five-year employment contract for the city administrator).

Additionally, the Public Access Bureau has determined that the language of section 2.02(c) of OMA " requires a public body' s agenda to identify the general subject matter of final action – not what particular action will be taken by a public body." Ill. Att'y Gen. PAC Req. Rev. Ltr. 39177, issued February 2, 2016, at 3-4 (determining that agenda item " Illinois Rt. 53/120 Project Environmental Impact Statement" did not violate section 2.02(c) of OMA because by inclusion on the agenda, it could be inferred that the Board anticipated taking final action on the matter).

The agenda for the Board' s March 27, 2023, meeting includes " Veolia Operation, Maintenance, Management Contract," but does not specify the action to be taken on that item. 1 The item was listed under the " Business" 2 section of the agenda, which does not indicate or infer that the Board would merely receive information or discuss the matter without taking action. This office' s review of the recording you provided confirms that the Board voted to pursue negotiations on the specified contract. The agenda item describes the main elements of the item that the Board voted on. Although the Board could have better informed the public by providing additional information regarding its planned course of action on the contract, OMA does not require a public body to provide advance notice of the specific type of action it will take after deliberating. Because the Board provided sufficient advance notice of the general subject matter of the item it acted upon in accordance with section 2.02(c) of OMA, this office has determined that no further action is warranted as to this matter.

If you have any questions, you may contact me at benjamin. silver@ilag. gov. This letter serves to close this matter.

Very truly yours, BENJAMIN J. SILVER Assistant Attorney General Public Access Bureau 76015 o no fi war spd cc: Via electronic mail The Honorable Meghan Hennesy Chairman Sangamon Valley Public Water District 709 North Prairieview Road Mahomet, Illinois 61853 [email protected]

Notes from the original PDF (1)
  1. 1Sangamon Valley Public Water District, Agenda Item 4.C (March 27, 2023). 2Sangamon Valley Public Water District, Agenda Item 4 (March 27, 2023).